急用！翻译一段英文

Question

Previous research has shown that survival-related processing of word lists enhances retention
for that material. However, the claim that survival-related memories are more accurate
has only been examined when true recall and recognition of neutral material has
been measured. In the current experiments, we examined the adaptive memory superiority
effect for different types of processing and material, measuring accuracy more directly by
comparing true and false recollection rates. Survival-related information and processing
was examined using word lists containing backward associates of neutral, negative, and
survival-related critical lures and type of processing (pleasantness, moving, survival) was
varied using an incidental memory paradigm. Across four experiments, results showed that
survival-related words were more susceptible than negative and neutral words to the false
memory illusion and that processing information in terms of its relevance to survival independently increased this susceptibility to the false memory illusion. Overall, although survival-related processing and survival-related information resulted in poorer, not more
accurate, memory, such inaccuracies may have adaptive significance. These findings are
discussed in the context of false memory research and recent theories concerning the
importance of survival processing and the nature of adaptive memory.

Answer 1

以前的研究表明，生存的单词列表相关的加工提高保留
该材料。然而，生存的说法，相关的记忆更准确
只有真正被回收时审查和确认的中性物质
测量了。在目前的实验中，我们研究了自适应内存优势
效果的处理和材料的不同类型，测量精度更直接
比较真假回忆率。生存相关的信息和处理
被检查的单词列表，包含使用落后的联营中立的，消极的，
生存相关的关键诱惑和加工型（愉快性，移动，存活）的
不同的使用附带的内存模式。在4个实验，结果表明：
生存相关的词，较消极和中立虚假的言辞容易
记忆错觉，并在其相关条款处理信息的独立生存的易感性增加，这对虚假记忆错觉。总体而言，虽然生存相关的处理和生存相关的信息导致了贫困，而不是更多
准确，记忆，这些错误可能有适应意义。这些调查结果
在虚假记忆的研究和理论背景下讨论最近关于
生存的重要性的处理和记忆性的适应性。