把句子的structure图就是那个tree diagram 画出来啊。
给你个例子。有神马问题可以继续问我。
温馨提示：答案为网友推荐，仅供参考
第1个回答 2011-01-07
语言学有不同的流派的。不同的流派有不同的分析方法。传统语法是把句子分析成主谓宾等；楼上两位是从句法方面来分，一个s 由 NP 和VP组成，NP VP也可以再划分，直到最小成分；韩礼德就否定了sentence的概念，只有小句（clause)的概念，一个完整的clause是由theme(主位）和rheme(述位）构成的，这种分法更看重“意义”，也被称为“语篇语言学”。语言学是不断发展的，以前注重词等小片段，但现在语篇语言学的研究越来越多。你的问题没具体到一个流派，没法回答。
第2个回答 推荐于2017-12-16
在Syntax一章
The traditional S rule:
S → NP VP
This rule combines an NP with a VP to produce a sentence which does not have an internal structure containing a head, a complement and a specifier.
The revised S rule:
InflP(=S)→NP Infl VP
XP→Spec X Complement
This rule takes inflection as the head which takes an NP as its specifier and a VP as its complement.本回答被网友采纳
The traditional S rule:
S → NP VP
This rule combines an NP with a VP to produce a sentence which does not have an internal structure containing a head, a complement and a specifier.
The revised S rule:
InflP(=S)→NP Infl VP
XP→Spec X Complement
This rule takes inflection as the head which takes an NP as its specifier and a VP as its complement.本回答被网友采纳